The Great Advertising Scandal of 1983

So I was thumbing through our archives today (Yes, thumbing through — we keep old issues in massive books. None of this newfangled internet business for this newspaper, thanks) and came across this gem of an advertisement, which was published in Park Cities People circa 1983.

Kind of risque, no? I would research “Private Moments” to see if the intimate portraiture company is still in business, but I don’t want to risk that kind of Google search on my work computer. Anyone?

Share this article...
Email this to someone
email
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin

9 thoughts on “The Great Advertising Scandal of 1983

  • November 14, 2012 at 1:04 pm
    Permalink

    Wow, the 80’s. How about searching for the name of the photographer?

    Reply
  • November 14, 2012 at 1:09 pm
    Permalink

    I searched “Intimate Moments”. It comes up with lingerie. I searched “Intimate Moments Photography and there are a couple (Nebraska, Ontario…) but none in Texas. I’d say marketing is to blame! They should have been advertising for hair removal.

    Reply
  • November 14, 2012 at 5:58 pm
    Permalink

    maybe you guys could do some research, identify and contact the models – and get them to reproduce the pose 30 years later?

    Reply
  • November 14, 2012 at 6:07 pm
    Permalink

    Hey…isn’t that Kirk Dooley?! Modeling for his own paper to save some production costs no doubt!

    Reply
  • November 14, 2012 at 9:26 pm
    Permalink

    Wow, if you had posted this before last week’s election, this would have been some pretty low Chicago style politicking. Dig a little deeper on who the female model is, you’ll be surprised, she still looks great!

    Reply
  • November 15, 2012 at 11:31 am
    Permalink

    Is it Mrs. Branch?

    Reply
  • November 16, 2012 at 11:22 pm
    Permalink

    Definitely not Mrs. Branch. Her father is Vic Salvino and there is no way she would do that.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.